How Much It Takes To Make Ends Meet [Part 2]

In my last post about making ends meet, I went over the details of a study conducted by by Wider Opportunities for Women.  This study showed  the yearly amounts it would take for a family to survive and make ends meet or meet its basic needs.  Here are those figures:  One Worker:  $30,012; Two Workers:  $42,504; One Worker, One Infant:  $46,368; One Worker, Two Young Children:  $57,756; Two Workers, Two Children:  $67,920

As I mentioned before, I was surprised at these figures and thought they were somewhat high.  I know that where I live (near Atlanta, Georgia) plays a part in this, but my family has been able to do well despite living on much less than the figures showed in this study.  We did have a good start and took advantage of opportunities that others did not have such as living overseas for two years, being able to borrow money interest-free to pay for our wedding and moving when the housing market was still strong, but my family has managed to live on my teacher’s salary for the past five years.

Make Ends MeetMy wife, Tracy, was a teacher before becoming a stay-at-home mom once my oldest daughter was born almost seven years ago.  Tracy stayed at home that first year of Ava’s life, worked part-time the next year and has been a full-time stay-at-home mom since.  In 2007, we added another daughter to the mix.  According to this study, we would need to make almost $68,000 to survive and meet our basic needs.  My salary is not even in the same ballpark as this figure.  In fact, the most I have ever made in a year (before taxes) is a little above $41,000.  Despite earning this amount, we have no debt except our mortgage (which we actually refinanced to a 15 year loan a couple of years ago), invest each month for our retirement and for the girls’ college, have an emergency fund in place and basically live a “wealthy” life on a moderate income.  Now, don’t get me wrong, we don’t have the nicest cars – we both drive older vehicles – or live in a 5,000 square foot house, but we are able to survive and meet our basic needs.

I basically think it boils down to how we view our money.  We know exactly where every dollar goes and don’t buy things we cannot afford.  We do have “nice” things – as I am writing this post I am currently watching The Masters Golf Tournament on my 50 inch, high-definition television set – but we don’t have it all.  I think that is what has gotten so many people into financial trouble.  Many think they can have whatever they want and usually that is not the case.  If  I wanted to drive a nicer car I could, but something would have to change.  I would either have to make more money or cut something out.  I think a lot of people have gone along buying whatever they wanted and did not look at the bigger picture.  Although it has not been easy and we have made some sacrifices, my family is living proof that 1 worker with a family of 2 can do well financially on a lot less than $67,000 a year.  It does take a little work and a lot of planning but it can be done.

Photo credit: mangpages

Free Email Newsletter
The Weekly Article Newsletter Delivered Straight to Your Inbox!
Get this free handy eBook that provides 25 ways to save money on your cell phone bill.

About Danny Kofke

Danny is currently a special education teacher and author of "How To Survive (and perhaps thrive) On A Teacher's Salary." His frugality has enabled him to pursue a job he is passionate about and, at the same time, support a family of four on his salary alone. Follow Danny's Blog, find him on Twitter, and order his book.

,

  • http://www.moreaboutmj.com/mjcollection Melanie

    I think you make a good point about being able to live on less and live a rich life. However, if you would account for the money that your wife contributes to the family as a stay-at-home mom, you would be well over that $68,000 mark. Your wife provides an invisible income by providing childcare and I’m guessing many other functions, e.g. cooking at home. So I think before you second guess the numbers you should account for the economic value of a stay-at-home mom.
    Melanie recently posted..Day 27- Dimensional CupcakeMy Profile

    • http://faithfulfinance.blogspot.com/ Melissa Blackson

      Great point! The “income” added to a household by stay-at-home moms is often overlooked. Childcare alone costs approx $150 per week per child until they are 4 where I live.
      Melissa Blackson recently posted..Isnt It AmazingMy Profile

  • JMD

    The figures that are posted for wages are very dependent on the location in which you live. Those numbers would be very difficult without some major sacrificing in our largest and most expensive cities.

  • http://www.krantcents.com krantcents

    I am at a different stage of life (near retirement), however I can relate to what you say. My wife and I (our kids are grown) enjoy many things, however at a lower cost. We just returned from 5 days in New Orleans (vacation). I used miles for the tickets and stayed at a modest B & B. Food was our only luxury. We have no debt except for a small mortgage. This gives us a lot of flexibility.
    krantcents recently posted..Even More Financial Skills for TeensMy Profile